What type of safety strategy might operating entities choose during restoration activities?

What type of safety strategy might operating entities choose during restoration activities?

• A. To keep all circuits closed until inspections are complete
• B. To implement remote monitoring on all circuits
• C. To perform a supervisory OPEN control on all "open" breakers prior to being energized
• D. To communicate exclusively via radio

Answer: (C)

During restoration activities, a key safety strategy that operating entities might choose is performing a supervisory OPEN control on all "open" breakers prior to being energized. This is critical in ensuring the safety of personnel and the equipment involved in the restoration process. When a circuit is opened, it is presumed to be de-energized, but there could still be unforeseen issues that might lead to a breaker inadvertently being energized. By executing a supervisory OPEN control, operators can validate the status of each breaker and ensure they remain in the open position until it is confirmed that they can be safely closed. This step helps prevent accidental electric shocks and equipment damage, which is paramount in a restoration scenario where safety and reliability are the primary concerns. The other strategies, while they may have their benefits, do not directly address the immediate safety needs during restoration. Closing all circuits until inspections are complete could pose risks without ensuring safety checks, remote monitoring of all circuits could lead to false assessments, and exclusive radio communication might limit effective coordination. Therefore, the choice of a supervisory OPEN control on all open breakers stands out as a proactive measure focusing on safeguarding against potential hazards during the critical phase of restoration.

During restoration activities, a key safety strategy that operating entities might choose is performing a supervisory OPEN control on all "open" breakers prior to being energized. This is critical in ensuring the safety of personnel and the equipment involved in the restoration process.

When a circuit is opened, it is presumed to be de-energized, but there could still be unforeseen issues that might lead to a breaker inadvertently being energized. By executing a supervisory OPEN control, operators can validate the status of each breaker and ensure they remain in the open position until it is confirmed that they can be safely closed. This step helps prevent accidental electric shocks and equipment damage, which is paramount in a restoration scenario where safety and reliability are the primary concerns.

The other strategies, while they may have their benefits, do not directly address the immediate safety needs during restoration. Closing all circuits until inspections are complete could pose risks without ensuring safety checks, remote monitoring of all circuits could lead to false assessments, and exclusive radio communication might limit effective coordination. Therefore, the choice of a supervisory OPEN control on all open breakers stands out as a proactive measure focusing on safeguarding against potential hazards during the critical phase of restoration.